The Law Is Agnostic About Truth.

I Don't Believe In Firing Professors. They Have Academic Freedom.

It's Never Acceptable To Target Civilians. It Violates The Geneva Accords, It Violates The International Law Of War And It Violates All Principles Of Morality.

I Understand That It's Good Tactics To Categorize Me As A Close-minded, Unobjective Extremist, But Nobody That Respects Me Has Those Views.

Yes, Believers And Non-believers And Skeptics Can All Live Together And Get Along. But There Cannot Be An Imperialistic Imposition Of Religion By The State Or By The Church. All People Must Be Equal--believers, Skeptics, Disbelievers, Atheists, And Those Who Chose Religion. Unless We Are All Deemed Equal, And Unless The Morality Of Disbelief Is Deemed The Equivalent Of The Morality Of Belief, We Will Simply Be Tolerated, And That Is Not The American Way.

I Don't Think The Law Exists To Arrive At The Truth. If It Did, We Wouldn't Have Exclusionary Rules, We Wouldn't Have Presumptions Of Innocence, We Wouldn't Have Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt. There's An Enormous Difference Between The Role Of Truth In Law And The Role Of Truth In Science. In Law, Truth Is One Among Many Goals.