You May Object That By Speaking Of

The Positivists Have A Simple Solution: The World Must Be Divided Into That Which We Can Say Clearly And The Rest, Which We Had Better Pass Over In Silence. But Can Anyone Conceive Of A More Pointless Philosophy, Seeing That What We Can Say Clearly Amounts To Next To Nothing? If We Omitted All That Is Unclear, We Would Probably Be Left Completely Uninteresting And Trivial Tautologies.

The World Thus Appears As A Complicated Tissue Of Events, In Which Connections Of Different Kinds Alternate Or Overlap Or Combine And Thereby Determine The Texture Of The Whole.

The Basic Idea Is To Shove All Fundamental Difficulties Onto The Neutron And To Do Quantum Mechanics In The Nucleus.

Modern Physics Has Changed Nothing In The Great Classical Disciplines Of, For Instance, Mechanics, Optics, And Heat. Only The Conception Of Hitherto Unexplored Regions, Formed Prematurely From A Knowledge Of Only Certain Parts Of The World, Has Undergone A Decisive Transformation. This Conception, However, Is Always Decisive For The Future Course Of Research.

I Believe That The Existence Of The Classical "path" Can Be Pregnantly Formulated As Follows: The "path" Comes Into Existence Only When We Observe It.