Without Children, Men Have More Liberty To

There Is What Might Be Called A Catch-22 Of Hazardous Occupations: The More Hazardous The Job, The More Men; The More Men, The Less We Care About Making The Job Safer. The Catch-22 Of Hazardous Occupations Creates A 'glass Cellar' Which Few Women Wish To Enter. Women Are Alienated Not Just Out Of The Fear Of Being Hurt On The Job, But By An Atmosphere That Can Make A Hazardous Job More Hazardous Than It Needs To Be.

If Women Really Earned Fifty-nine Cents To The Dollar For The Same Work As Men, What Business Could Compete Effectively By Hiring Men At Any Level?

Ideally There Should Not Be A Men's Movement But A Gender Transition Movement; Only The Power Of The Women's Movement Necessitates The Temporary Corrective Of A Men's Movement. And This Creates A Special Challenge For Men: There Are Few Political Movements Filled With Healthy People, Yet Few Healthy Changes Have Occurred Without Political Movements.

It Is Ironic That A Movement That Made Its Reputation Championing The Irrelevance Of Biological Differences When Those Differences Were To Most Women's Disadvantage Immediately Returned To Biological Determinism When Those Differences Were To The Most Women's Advantage.

Here's The Pay Paradox That Why Men Earn More Explains: Men Earn More Money, Therefore Men Have More Power; And Men Earn More Money, Therefore Men Have Less Power (earning More Money As An Obligation, Not An Option). The Opposite Is True For Women: Women Earn Less Money, Therefore Women Have Less Power; And Women Earn Less Money, Therefore Women Have More Power (the Option To Raise Children, Or To Not Take A Hazardous Job).