What Does Censorship Reveal? It Reveals Fear.

Because [donald Trump] So Clearly - Through His Words And Actions And The Type Of People That Turn Up At His Rallies - Represents People Who Are Not The Middle, Not The Upper Middle Educated Class, There Is A Fear Of Seeming To Be Associated In Any Way With Them, A Social Fear That Lowers The Class Status Of Anyone Who Can Be Accused Of Somehow Assisting Trump In Any Way, Including Any Criticism Of Hillary Clinton.

Well, There's A Question As To What Sort Of Information Is Important In The World, What Sort Of Information Can Achieve Reform. And There's A Lot Of Information. So Information That Organizations Are Spending Economic Effort Into Concealing, That's A Really Good Signal That When The Information Gets Out, There's A Hope Of It Doing Some Good...

Let's Say That, Personally, I Loved Hillary Clinton. Would Wikileaks Still Publish This Material? Of Course It Would. Otherwise, We Would Be Censoring It. That's Our Mandate. It's Actually Interesting To Think About What Media Organizations Wouldn't Publish Such Material If It Was Given To Them.

We Get Information In The Mail, The Regular Postal Mail, Encrypted Or Not, Vet It Like A Regular News Organization, Format It - Which Is Sometimes Something That's Quite Hard To Do, When You're Talking About Giant Databases Of Information - Release It To The Public And Then Defend Ourselves Against The Inevitable Legal And Political Attacks.

My Answer Is That [donald] Trump Would Not Be Permitted To Win. Why Do I Say That? Because He's Had Every Establishment Off Side; Trump Doesn't Have One Establishment, Maybe With The Exception Of The Evangelicals, If You Can Call Them An Establishment, But Banks, Intelligence [agencies], Arms Companies... Big Foreign Money ... Are All United Behind Hillary Clinton, And The Media As Well, Media Owners And Even Journalists Themselves.