[w]ords Are Fine, But It Has To

If We Set The Precedent Of Limiting The First Amendment, In Order To Protect The Sensibilities Of Those Who Are Offended By Flag Burning, What Will We Say The Next Time Someone Is Offended By Some Other Minority View, Or By Some Other Person's Exercise Of The Freedom The Constitution Is Supposed To Protect?

The City Of Hiroshima Stands As More Than A Monument To Massive Death And Destruction. It Stands As A Living Testament To The Necessity For Progress Toward Nuclear Disarmament.

Judges Are Appointed By And With The Advice And Consent Of The Senate. And It Is Our Duty To Ask Questions On Great Issues That Matter To The American People And To Speak For Them.

If Saddam's Regime And Survival Are Threatened [by Invasion], He Will Have Nothing To Lose, And May Use Everything At His Disposal... If Weapons Of Mass Destruction Land On Israeli Soil, Killing Innocent Civilians, The Experts I Have Consulted Believe Israel Will Retaliate, And Possibly With Nuclear Weapons... Nor Can We Rule Out The Possibility That Saddam Would Assault American Forces With Chemical Or Biological Weapons.

Do We Operate Under A System Of Equal Justice Under Law? Or Is There One System For The Average Citizen And Another For The High And Mighty?