The Thing Is, I Think As A

I Get Most Of My Reviews Through E-mail, And Then I Go And Read It And Go On Message Boards To Check It Out. I Want To See What's Out There And To Better Estimate My Position. I'm Definitely Happy That A Lot Of People Are Voting Positively For Postal - Especially The Hundreds And Hundreds Who Actually Saw It. Still, There Are A Lot Of People Who Didn't See It Who Are Giving Me Only One Point Out Of 10 Because They Hate Me, And It Has Nothing To Do With The Movie.

We Did Casting In L.a. And A Lot Of People Came Against The Advice Of Their Agents. The Agents Said, "you Shouldn't Be In Postal, It Will Damage Your Career." So Zack Ward Came To Casting And Played One Of The Cop Parts, And Then Later I Looked At The Dvds Again And Said, "this Guy Is Postal Dude." He's Like White Trailer Trash. He's Had A Long Time In The Film Industry, But No Real Success. He Needs Money; He's Two-times Divorced In Real Life. He Said He Works Only To Pay Off His Philippine Ex-wife.

In The Name Of The King Is The Right Title. To Be Honest, I Don't Know Who Had The Final Idea For The Title But I Liked It And It Has A Strong Connection To The Movie's Story.

I Think Without The Harsh Critics, I Would Maybe Have Not Made Progress. From Bloodrayne On, I Spent More Time And Money On The Development.

I Want To Be Like, "look At Postal Like Quentin Tarantino Did It. Brainwash Yourself And Convince Yourself That Tarantino Did It. Forget My Name And Enjoy The 100 Minutes And Then Write Your Review."