The Question Is, We Have A Particular

Certainly It Is Wrong To Be Cruel To Animals And The Destruction Of A Whole Species Can Be A Great Evil. The Capacity For Feelings Of Pleasure And Pain And For The Form Of Life Of Which Animals Are Capable Clearly Impose Duties Of Compassion And Humanity In Their Case.

Now The Good Of Political Life Is A Great Political Good. It Is Not A Secular Good Specified By A Comprehensive Doctrine Like Those Of Kant Or Mill. You Could Characterize This Political Good As The Good Of Free And Equal Citizens Recognizing The Duty Of Civility To One Another: The Duty To Give Citizens Public Reasons For One's Political Actions.

No One Deserves His Greater Natural Capacity Nor Merits A More Favorable Starting Place In Society.

Of Course, We Know That Not Everyone Agrees With Assisted Suicide, But People Might Agree That One Has The Right To It, Even If They're Not Themselves Going To Exercise It.

Thus I Assume That To Each According To His Threat Advantage Is Not A Conception Of Justice.