In The Civil Society, The Individual Is

Judicial Activists Are Nothing Short Of Radicals In Robes--contemptuous Of The Rule Of Law, Subverting The Constitution At Will, And Using Their Public Trust To Impose Their Policy Preferences On Society. In Fact, No Radical Political Movement Has Been More Effective In Undermining Our System Of Government Than The Judiciary. And With Each Supreme Court Term, We Hold Our Collective Breath Hoping The Justices Will Do No Further Damage, Knowing Full Well They Will Disappoint. Such Is The Nature Of Judicial Tyranny.

Activist Supreme Courts Are Not New. The Dred Scott Decision In 1856, Imposing Slavery In Free Territories; The Plessy Decision In 1896, Imposing Segregation On A Private Railroad Company; The Korematsu Decision In 1944, Upholding Franklin Roosevelt’s Internment Of American Citizens, Mostly Japanese Americans; And The Roe Decision In 1973, Imposing Abortion On The Entire Nation; Are Examples Of The Consequences Of Activist Courts And Justices.

The Only Dynasty I Like Is The Duck Dynasty.

The Conservative Sees In The Free Market The Harmony Of Interests And Rules Of Cooperation That Also Underlie The Civil Society.

The Government Does Not Add Value To The Economy. It Removes Value From The Economy By Imposing Taxes On One Citizen And Providing Cash To Another.