I Went To The Computer And Tried

I Was Asking Questions Which Nobody Else Had Asked Before, Because Nobody Else Had Actually Looked At Certain Structures. Therefore, As I Will Tell, The Advent Of The Computer, Not As A Computer But As A Drawing Machine, Was For Me A Major Event In My Life. That's Why I Was Motivated To Participate In The Birth Of Computer Graphics, Because For Me Computer Graphics Was A Way Of Extending My Hand, Extending It And Being Able To Draw Things Which My Hand By Itself, And The Hands Of Nobody Else Before, Would Not Have Been Able To Represent.

Nobody Will Deny That There Is At Least Some Roughness Everywhere

I Claim That Many Patterns Of Nature Are So Irregular And Fragmented, That, Compared With Euclid - A Term Used In This Work To Denote All Of Standard Geometry - Nature Exhibits Not Simply A Higher Degree But An Altogether Different Level Of Complexity ... The Existence Of These Patterns Challenges Us To Study These Forms That Euclid Leaves Aside As Being "formless," To Investigate The Morphology Of The "amorphous."

If You Have A Hammer, Use It Everywhere You Can, But I Do Not Claim That Everything Is Fractal.

Some Mathematicians Didn't Even Perceive Of The Possibility Of A Picture Being Helpful. To The Contrary, I Went Into An Orgy Of Looking At Pictures By The Hundreds; The Machines Became A Little Bit Better.