I Shall Develop The Thesis That Anyone

The State Is In Danger Of Falling Into Disrepute Due To The Evidence Of Its Inadequate Resources.

[critical Social Science Attempts] To Determine When Theoretical Statements Grasp Invariant Regularities Of Social Action As Such And When They Express Ideologically Frozen Relations Of Dependence That Can In Principle Be Transformed.

Today's Islamic Fundamentalism Is Also A Cover For Political Motifs. We Should Not Overlook The Political Motifs We Encounter In Forms Of Religious Fanaticism

Norms Appearing In The Form Of Law Entitle Actors To Exercise Their Rights Or Liberties. However, One Cannot Determine Which Of These Laws Are Legitimate Simply By Looking At The Form Of Individual Rights. Only By Bringing In The Discourse Principle Can One Show That Each Person Is Owed A Right To The Greatest Possible Measure Of Equal Liberties That Are Mutually Compatible.

I Would In Fact Tend To Have More Confidence In The Outcome Of A Democratic Decision If There Was A Minority That Voted Against It, Than If It Was Unanimous... Social Psychology Has Amply Shown The Strength Of This Bandwagon Effect.