I Just Think That This Whole Issue

In Drawing An Inference Or Conclusion From Facts Proved, Regard Must Always Be Had To The Nature Of The Particular Case, And The Facility That Appears To Be Afforded, Either Of Explanation Or Contradiction. No Person Is To Be Required To Explain Or Contradict, Until Enough Has Been Proved To Warrant A Reasonable And Just Conclusion Against Him, In The Absence Of Explanation Or Contradiction.

I Understand That Government Should Live Within Its Means, Value The Money It Holds In Trust From You The Taxpayer, Avoid Waste And, Above All Else, Observe The First Maxim Of Good Government: Namely, Do No Avoidable Harm.

The Problem With The Australian Practice Of Abortion Is That An Objectively Grave Matter Has Been Reduced To A Question Of The Mother’s Convenience.

I'm A Politician. I'm Not Going To Get Into A Whole Range Of Scientific Argument With Scientists.

I Am, As You Know, Hugely Unconvinced By The So-called Settled Science On Climate Change.