I Define Anarchist Society As One Where

We Must, Therefore, Emphasize That 'we' Are Not The Government; The Government Is Not 'us.' The Government Does Not In Any Accurate Sense 'represent' The Majority Of The People. But, Even If It Did, Even If 70 Percent Of The People Decided To Murder The Remaining 30 Percent, This Would Still Be Murder And Would Not Be Voluntary Suicide On The Part Of The Slaughtered Minority. No Organicist Metaphor, No Irrelevant Bromide That 'we Are All Part Of One Another,' Must Be Permitted To Obscure This Basic Fact.

Briefly, The State Is That Organization In Society Which Attempts To Maintain A Monopoly Of The Use Of Force And Violence In A Given Territorial Area; In Particular, It Is The Only Organization In Society That Obtains Its Revenue Not By Voluntary Contribution Or Payment For Services Rendered But By Coercion.

I Want To Make It Clear What I Am Not Saying. I Am Not Saying That Fiat Money, Once Established On The Ruins Of Gold, Cannot Then Continue Indefinitely On Its Own.

[t]he Crucial Question Is Not, As So Many Believe, Whether Property Rights Should Be Private Or Governmental, But Rather Whether The Necessarily 'private' Owners Are Legitimate Owners Or Criminals. For Ultimately, There Is No Entity Called 'government'; There Are Only People Forming Themselves Into Groups Called 'governments' And Acting In A 'governmental' Manner. All Property Is Therefore Always 'private'; The Only And Critical Question Is Whether It Should Reside In The Hands Of Criminals Or Of The Proper And Legitimate Owners.

To Those Advocates Of Independent Paper Moneys Who Also Champion The Free Market, I Would Address This Simple Question: "why Don't You Advocate The Unlimited Freedom Of Each Individual To Manufacture Dollars?" If Dollars Are Really And Properly Things-in-themselves, Why Not Let Everyone Manufacture Them As They Manufacture Wheat And Baby Food?