Eu Didn't Advance Our [eastern Europe] Democracy

I Was 25 Years Old And Pursuing My Doctorate In Economics When I Was Allowed To Spend Six Months Of Postgraduate Studies In Naples, Italy. I Read The Western Economic Textbooks And Also The More General Work Of People Like Hayek. By The Time I Returned To Czechoslovakia, I Had An Understanding Of The Principles Of The Market. In 1968, I Was Glad At The Political Liberalism Of The Dubcek Prague Spring, But I Was Very Critical Of The Third Way They Pursued In Economics.

To Talk About Planning An Economic System Is To Talk In Old Terms, And I Find Myself Sometimes Having To Teach Westerners About What The Market Really Means.

Being Often With Many Leading Politicians, I Feel Frustrated That They Do Not Listen. They Already Know. They Fully Subscribed To The Idea That Talking About 'saving The Planet' Is An Effective Way To Show Their 'caring' For Humanity And That It Is The Easiest Way To Maximize Votes Irrespective Of Any Relevant Activity Which Would Aim At The Real Needs Of People. The Global Warming Dogma Has Become A Very Easy Form Of Escapism From The Current Reality.

But How Can You Speed Up The Transformation Of Society In A Country As Large As Russia? Those Sounding The Moral Outcry Are The Ones Who Are Trying To Dictate Their Standards From The Outside. Of Course, That Isn't The Right Way To Go Either. One Cannot Impose Democracy From The Other Side Of National Borders, Which Is Something We Ourselves Experienced During The Communist Era. The West's Policies Toward Eastern Europe, The Helsinki Process - None Of That Really Helped Us.

I'm Convinced That After Years Of Studying The Phenomenon, Global Warming Is Not The Real Issue Of Temperature. That Is The Issue Of A New Ideology Or A New Religion. A Religion Of Climate Change Or A Religion Of Global Warming. This Is A Religion Which Tells Us That The People Are Responsible For The Current, Very Small Increase In Temperatures. And They Should Be Punished.