Being Is Only Being For Dasein.

What Was Aristotle’s Life?’ Well, The Answer Lay In A Single Sentence: ‘he Was Born, He Thought, He Died.’ And All The Rest Is Pure Anecdote.

In No Way Can It Be Uttered, As Can Other Things, Which One Can Learn. Rather, From Out Of A Full, Co-existential Dwelling With The Thing Itself - As When A Spark, Leaping From The Fire, Flares Into Light - So It Happens, Suddenly, In The Soul, There To Grow, Alone With Itself.

The Question Concerning Technology Is The Question Concerning The Constellation In Which Revealing And Concealing, In Which The Coming To Presence Of Truth, Comes To Pass

If In Nietzsche's Thinking The Prior Tradition Of Western Thought Is Gathered And Completed In A Decisive Respect, Then The Confrontation With Nietzsche Becomes One With All Western Thought Hitherto.

Body', 'soul', And 'spirit' May Designate Phenomenal Domains Which Can Be Detached As Themes For Definite Investigations; Within Certain Limits Their Ontological Indefiniteness May Not Be Important. When, However, We Come To The Question Of Man's Being, This Is Not Something We Can Simply Compute By Adding Together Those Kinds Of Being Which Body, Soul, And Spirit Respectively Possess--kinds Of Being Whose Nature Has Not As Yet Been Determined. And Even If We Should Attempt Such An Ontological Procedure, Some Idea Of The Being Of The Whole Must Be Presupposed.