As A Theist I Believe That God

Modernist Discourse [...] Incorporates Semantic Devices - Such As The Labeling Of Theism As 'religion' And Naturalism As 'science' - That Work To Prevent A Dangerous Debate Over Fundamental Assumptions From Breaking Out In The Open.

We're Not Trying To Prove The Character Of God Through Science. That's A Bad Idea. What I'm Trying To Do Is Clear Away The Misunderstandings, The Debris That Prevent People From Accepting That God Who Wants To Accept Them.

All The Most Prominent Darwinists Proclaim Naturalistic Philosophy When They Think It Safe To Do So.

Although I Insist That God Has Always Had The Power To Intervene Directly In Nature To Create New Forms, I Am Willing To Be Per-suaded That He Chose Not To Do So And Instead Employed Secondary Natural Causes Like Random Mutation And Natural Selection.

Most Importantly, I Agree That The Truth Of These Matters Should Be Determined By Interpretation Of Scientific Evidence - Experiments, Fossil Studies And The Like.