Anarchism Is Surprisingly Effective In Solving Actual

People Don't Have An Ongoing Relation Unless It's A Form Of Debt Because Everything Is An Exchange, So Ongoing Relationships Are Incomplete Exchanges, And Therefore One Party Is Probably To Blame - More Likely Than Not, Both Are. Sociality Itself Seems To Become Like A Matter Of Sin, And Inherently Wrong.

Within A Capitalist Corporation, Someone Says, "lend Me A Wrench," And Someone Asks, "yeah, What Do I Get?" You Assume That The Idea Of Each According To His Or Her Abilities, Each According To His Or Her Needs - In Solving A Problem - Is Actually The Only Thing That Works. And In Situations Of Disaster, There Are Often Communistic Notions Of Improvisation, Where You Basically Exchange Hierarchies And All Of A Sudden All Those Things That Are Luxuries That You Can't Afford, You Have Them In An Emergency.

The Difference Between Capitalism And Feudalism Is That Under Capitalism, They Make Money Directly Through Wages, Manufacturing, And Commerce And Under Feudalism, It's Directly Through Juro-political Means.

The Working Poor Are The People Suffering Out Subprime Mortgages And Fatal Loans And More And More Of Our Money - You Know, Capitalism Is Operated By Extracting Money, Not So Much Directly Being Paid.

Revolutionary Constituencies Always Involve A Tacit Alliance Between The Least Alienated And The Most Oppressed.